What is your comment on the Supreme Court saying it has held that 'Article 370 is a temporary provision'?
x-CJI DY Chandrachud had opened his mouth in February 2025 in a BBC interview on hotly debated topics and decision during his tenure. He discussed and justified his position of Article 370 and Ayodhya Ram temple. On Article 370, DY Chandrachud said, “Was 75 years was too short a period to abrogate such a provision.” He emphasised that the provision was meant to disappear with time and merge with the Constitution. The question is why it was allowed to be continued? Architects of Article 370 were PM Jawaharlal Nehru and his close associate Sheikh Abdullah (some people call him half-brother of Nehru). Sheikh Abdullah prime compulsion was Pakistan’s arrogant determination to take over the state by force and ignore all the local political elements. He had serious reservations about Kashmir being an integral part of India. As his own speeches and declassified documents of the U.S. State Department reveal, he was working towards independent Kashmir under his own domination. Bakshi Ghulam Moha...