Did Nehru fail to understand that the land reforms he imposed in India were not a success?
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
PM Nehru failed to implement land reform needed to improve agriculture output due to powerful zamindar (landlord) lobby. Nehru and his team were seemingly innocent of the basics of economics that without a prosperous agriculture, you can’t have agricultural surplus, and without that, you can’t feed the growing urban population and sustain industrialisation. Yet, they neglected agriculture. Agriculture was so neglected that by 1957 India’s agricultural output fell below that of 1953!
Most countries like Japan and others who rapidly progressed and joined the first-world, first concentrated on agriculture and universal education. Nehru neglected both. Nehru copied the Soviets, without realising that all communist countries faced famines thanks to their stress on heavy industries at the expense of agriculture.
Nehru went socialistic where he should not have—in industrialisation; and did not go socialistic where he should have—in agriculture and land reforms. The renowned economist Jagdish Bhagwati had suggested that probably India needed capitalism in industry and socialism in land. But, Nehru did the reverse—besides wrong notions, the main factor was votes: Why annoy the powerful landlords and landed class? Wrote journalist Kuldip Nayar.
A report on land reforms by Wolf Ladejinsky vehemently criticized the government for having reforms on paper but doing very little on the ground. Surprisingly, it was Nehru who had stopped the report from being made public... Nehru abandoned the proposal to initiate drastic land reforms when he found that the states were opposed to the measure. This sent a wrong message to the country and proved yet again that he hated to join issue when vested interests were involved.
I had quarrelled with Nehru regarding his neglect of the village economy, especially agriculture, and protested to him about his almost total neglect of irrigation which was the key to Indian agriculture... Nehru told me disparagingly, ‘You are a villager, you know nothing.’ I retorted, ‘If you had one-tenth of my regard for the village, the Indian economy would have been different.’...I am not sure if he had any convictions, except for aping the Soviet/Russian model. This was stated by S. Nijalingappa, ex-CM of Karnataka in his book, ‘My Life and Politics: An Autobiography’.
Nehru playing with his Red Panda pet
India faced severe shortages in food-items, became dependent on the US PL-480 food-aid, and became an international beggar. But PM Nehru maintained his glamorous global trips for the sake of global peace and prosperity and displayed his diplomatic skills to the international audience while the country suffered acute hunger. The food crisis continued in 1950s and 1960s. After Nehru's death, Lal Bahadur Shastri became PM in 1964. PM Shastri used to fast one day in a week as a symbolic measure to conserve food grains.
Congress is a dynastic party. Sonia Gandhi was congress parliamentary party chairperson. If she resigns, only two dynastic leaders are there who can be given that post – Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi. Congress has decided to retain Sonia Gandhi for the post. Some ting never change in congress. PV Narasimha Rao tried to democratize this dynastic party but failed. He also paid the price for that. This is a 40 year old cartoon…always applicable for congress Picture Source: Google Rajya Sabha MP Sonia Gandhi Re-Elected As Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge proposed Sonia Gandhi name as the chairperson of the parliamentary party at a meeting of party’s MPs. https://www.india.com/news/rajya-sabha-mp-sonia-gandhi-re-elected-as-congress-parliamentary-party-chairperson-7001000/
Delhi CM Kejriwal has been promising the clean the Yamuna since 2015 massive election win. His failure in this regard in in 9 years only gain proved that old political theory – leftist, communist and naxalite leaders are good for nothing. They can fight with others, blame others and give freebies to win election. Just look at Kejriwal’s mentor Mamata Banerjee’s 13 year tenure in Bengal as a basket case of naxalite govt. Clean water only for Kejriwal P.S. -This post is neither spam nor plagiarised material and follows Quora policy Picture source: Google / Respective rightful owner Delhi: Yamuna will be cleaned by December 2023, says Satyendar Jain Delhi Water Minister Satyendar Jain said that the Yamuna river will be completely cleaned by December 2023. Earlier, Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal had said the river will be cleaned by 2025. https://www.indiatoday.in/cities/delhi/story/delhi-yamuna-will-be-cleaned-by-december-2023-says-satyendar-jain-1928141-2022-03-22 History of false promise...
During 1962 general election Nehru went to Kashi (Varanasi) and in a speech he said, ‘a lot of marble is used in temples, just like it is used in bathrooms. People think that the more marble you use, the more beautiful the thing will look. But seeing marble reminds me of bathrooms’. This speech given by Nehru in Kashi hurt the sentiments of Hindus, many people protested. But instead of apologizing, Nehru again reiterated these thoughts in an election rally in Jaipur during this time. He said in Jaipur, ‘the temples that are built today are absolutely worthless. As I had said in Banaras, perhaps people were offended. Here the beauty of temples is considered to be putting a lot of marble stone in them. Marble is a good stone, but marble stone always reminds me of bathrooms’. It is possible that Nehru was expressing concern about the architecture of Hindu temples in his election speech and perhaps he was mentioning the bathroom by giving the example of the same. But the same example can b...
Comments
Post a Comment