Is India's R&AW the new Mossad? Are Modi and Ajit Doval changing India's image of being a "soft state"?

In April 2001, all leading Indian newspapers carried a photograph on the front page which made the collective heart of a nation sink. The photo was of Bangladeshi villagers carrying the body of an Indian border soldier dangling by his hands and feet from a bamboo pole like a freshly hunted animal. He was one of the 16 Border Security Force soldiers allegedly tortured and killed by Bangladesh Rifles men in a border skirmish.

The entire nation watched helplessly as a young nuclear power failed to act against even tiny Bangladesh and swallowed the humiliation with merely meek condemnation. What Indians despondently believed was embodied in that front-page image: theirs was a ‘soft State’. The label was hung in an even larger font after each terror strike, culminating with the 26/11 Mumbai attack. India’s political and security establishments were caught asleep; the air force did not even have the coordinates of Pakistan terror camps to retaliate. India kept sending dossiers of Pakistan-sponsored terrorists, Pakistan kept crumpling those into paper balls and throwing them into a bin. Indian PM’s approach to USA President complaing about terrorism emerging from Pakistan was mocked by Pakistani leadership as ‘dehati aurat’.

From that day to recent event when Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused Indian intelligence agencies of being behind the assassination of India-designated Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, India has come a long way. Today, India is seen by the world as a ‘hard State’; a rising potential superpower which unhesitatingly retaliates against the enemy with stunning force.

The new ‘hard State’ label is a by-product of National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval’s ‘defensive offence’ doctrine, in which you go and attack the place where the offence is coming from. As NSA, he set his doctrine into motion with a terse but eloquent warning to Pakistan: ‘You do one more Mumbai, you lose Balochistan.’ And from the beginning of Modi’s prime ministership, we have witnessed defensive offence in motion. The 2015 Myanmar cross-border operation against Naga militants, the 2016 post-Uri attack surgical strike across the LoC, and Balakot airstrike of 2019 after the Pulwama terror attack were a dramatic departure from India’s former policy of masochistic restraint. India even took China by surprise by digging its heels for 72 days in Doklam under a constant verbal threats from every Chinese media and returning its murderous aggression at Galwan and Pangong-Tso with bloodier reprisals.

India has adopted the strategy of unpredictable action, letting go of its predictable passivity in external and internal security matters. When one responds with unpredictable force and timing to enemy action, the adversary must think ten times before launching the next attack. Interestingly, not a single casualty in terrorist attacks has happened since Modi took over in 2014. But lately, another angle has been added to India’s response to external threats. The smell — rightly or mistakenly — of covert action. This India learned from Israel and there may be Israeli help in these missions. Since 2019 and especially in the last 24 months, over a dozen of India’s avowed enemies have been killed in their safe havens overseas.

It could be sheer coincidence. Pakistan, for instance, is going through a period of political and economic chaos so unsettling that rival gangs, on the loose because of an absent government, could be killing each other. But the sheer number of eliminations makes people wonder whether India has embarked on a Mossad-like ‘Wrath of God’ mission which saw Israeli intelligence getting rid of the 1972 Munich terrorists one by one.

Let us see what has happened to India’s most wanted terrorist since 2019 in their overseas ‘safe havens’.

1. Hardeep Singh Nijjar was killed near a gurdwara in Surrey, Canada, by two unknown assailants in June 2023. India had designated him as a wanted terrorist, NIA had a Rs10 lakh reward for info on him, and Interpol had issued a red corner alert. He had entered Canada illegally with a fake passport and worked as a plumber.

2. Rayaz Ahmed alias Abu Qasim was shot dead in a mosque in PoK in September 2023.

3. Maulana Masood Azhar reportedly escaped a massive blast in 2019 at the madrassa he was hiding in Peshawar. However, the most-wanted terrorist has had no public appearance since then, triggering speculation on whether he is dead.

4. Bashir Ahmed Peer of Hizbul Mujahideen was shot dead at point-blank range in Rawalpindi in February 2023.

5. Al Badr commander Syed Khalid Raza was killed by a single shot in the head in Karachi in February 2023.

6. Khalistani extremist Avtar Singh Khanda, who targeted the Indian mission in the UK, died of “unknown causes” at a Birmingham hospital in June 2023.

7. Aijaz Ahmad Ahangar, a Kashmiri terrorist functioning as a top commander of ISIS, was reportedly killed in Afghanistan’s Kunar province in February 2023.

8. Jaish-e-Mohammed’s Mistry Zahoor Ibrahim, one of the IC-814 hijackers who had slit passenger Rupin Katyal’s throat, was shot dead in Karachi in March 2022.

9. Khalistan Commando Force’s Paramjit Singh Panjwar was shot dead in Lahore by two gunmen in May 2023.

10. Lal Mohammed, a suspected ISI operative involved in pushing fake currency into India, was chased and shot dead on the outskirts of Kathmandu last year.

11. Khalistani terrorist Harwinder Rinda mysteriously dies in Lahore hospital in November 2022, reportedly of a drug overdose.

12. A day later, Khalistani terrorist and Rinda’s aide Happy Sanghera was killed in Italy.

13. Within 24 hours, Khalistani terrorist Kulwinderjit Singh Khanpuria was likely brought from Bangkok, arrest was shown in Delhi.

14. In June 2021, a powerful blast rocks UN-designated global terrorist Hafiz Saeed, founder of Lashkar-e-Toiba.

15. Earlier, his Talha Saeed was injured in a blast in Lahore.

Less than a decade ago, Indians were culturally not yet really for such action. It is impossible to say if India was behind the 15 attacks and kills but a perception of India as a hard, unforgiving State has slowly crystallised globally despite our firm denials. By radicalising and keeping its vast population impoverished, Pakistan has made it cheap and easy for India to hit it at will. Indian RAW can hire hitmen from any lane in Lahore, Karachi, or Peshawar for as little as Rs 10,000 to do mischief inside Pakistan. Any country that harbours terrorists and terror sympathisers in its backyard unwittingly creates a vicious ecosystem like Pakistan which one day turns on its host. Afghanistan is at war with itself since 1980s and this ruined Afghanistan completely. Hopefully Justin Trudeau can learn from Afghanistan and Pakistan case study and give more importance to national security than political arithmetic to retain power.

Article credit: Abjijit Majumdar

Picture source: Google / Getty / Respective rightful owner

2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes - Wikipedia

Series of armed skirmishes between Bangladesh and India The 2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes were a series of armed skirmishes between India and Bangladesh in April 2001. The clashes took place between troops of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) and the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) on the poorly-marked international border between the two countries . The clashes began on 16 April 2001, [12] when a force of around 1,000 Bangladeshi soldiers attacked and captured Padua village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee. [3] [4] Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by India since Bangladesh's war of Independence in 1971. [13] [6] The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) post in Padua village was surrounded, trapping several BSF troops within. However, both sides held their fire and began negotiations. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF companies proceeded to reinforce the outpost. [1] This incident was resolved later without any bloodshed. Following this standoff, BSF troops along the Bangladesh–India border were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of BSF troops entered Bangladeshi territory near the village of Boroibari, more than 200 km to the west of Padua. The intrusion was used as a " counter-attack " by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua. Immediately upon entering Bangladeshi territory, the 16 Indian paramilitary personnel were ambushed and killed by Bangladeshi border guards, who were assisted by hundreds of villagers. [6] Following their capture, the Indian soldiers were allegedly tortured by Bangladeshi security forces before being executed. The bodies of the Indian soldiers were returned to India on 20 April, and they showed signs of serious mutilation. [10] The clashes finally ended on 21 April 2001, after both sides agreed to a ceasefire . The clashes left a total of 21 people dead, including 16 Indian soldiers and three Bangladeshi border guards. The clashes were a major setback to the improving relations between India and Bangladesh. The two countries had signed a number of agreements in the years leading up to the clashes including the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement which served an important role in advancing the exchange of 111 enclaves (17,160.63 acres) from India to Bangladesh and reciprocatively, the latter transferred 51 enclaves (7,110.02 acres) to India. [14] Background The Partition of Bengal in 1947 left a poorly demarcated international border between the states of India and Bangladesh (erstwhile East Pakistan ). Ownership of several villages on both sides of the de facto border were disputed and claimed by both countries. The dispute over the demarcation of the India–Bangladesh border worsened due to the existence of over 190 enclaves . Cause One of the disputed areas was a small sliver of land near the village of Padua (also known as Pyrdiwah), on the border between Banglade

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Bangladesh%E2%80%93India_border_clashes